Kwetsbaarheden worden geladen…
Kwetsbaarheden worden geladen…
CVE-2026-98441
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: act_ct: avoid modifying shared unconfirmed ct entry In a case where skb with an unconfirmed ct entry gets cloned, we may end up processing both again but with different sets of extensions. The series of events: 1. The first clone wants to commit and runs the helpers wiring up the extension pointer into the expectation list. 2. Then it looses the confirmation keeping the entry unconfirmed. 3. Second clone now wants to commit labels or run NAT and adds the new extension for that breaking the pointer in the expectation list causing UAF on the destruction path later. While this is possible to trigger, there should be no practical network pipeline where we need to process both clones without modifications in the same zone. So, let's just reset the entry in case for some reason we got an skb with a shared one. This doesn't affect any known use cases, but avoids any potential problems with sharing and modification of the unconfirmed ct entry. Unlike openvswitch module, act_ct allows for NAT without commit. Changing that would be a uAPI break. So, act_ct needs to reset on NAT regardless of the commit flag to avoid reallocation of the extension space. This, however, doesn't really change the picture for sensible networking cases as there should be no need to run the same packet twice (before and after the clone) through conntrack without packet header or zone changes and without commit. The fixes tag points to the introduction of helpers, since that's the main UAF trigger for the sharing.
Dit record: live koppeling— laatst opgehaald: 7 november 2026 om 00:02.
Rechtstreeks overgenomen uit NVD, CISA of de leverancier — soms Engelstalig, ongewijzigd t.o.v. de bron.
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/sched: act_ct: avoid modifying shared unconfirmed ct entry In a case where skb with an unconfirmed ct entry gets cloned, we may end up processing both again but with different sets of extensions. The series of events: 1. The first clone wants to commit and runs the helpers wiring up the extension pointer into the expectation list. 2. Then it looses the confirmation keeping the entry unconfirmed. 3. Second clone now wants to commit labels or run NAT and adds the new extension for that breaking the pointer in the expectation list causing UAF on the destruction path later. While this is possible to trigger, there should be no practical network pipeline where we need to process both clones without modifications in the same zone. So, let's just reset the entry in case for some reason we got an skb with a shared one. This doesn't affect any known use cases, but avoids any potential problems with sharing and modification of the unconfirmed ct entry. Unlike openvswitch module, act_ct allows for NAT without commit. Changing that would be a uAPI break. So, act_ct needs to reset on NAT regardless of the commit flag to avoid reallocation of the extension space. This, however, doesn't really change the picture for sensible networking cases as there should be no need to run the same packet twice (before and after the clone) through conntrack without packet header or zone changes and without commit. The fixes tag points to the introduction of helpers, since that's the main UAF trigger for the sharing.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Attack vector
LOCAL
Privileges required
LOW
User interaction
NONE
Vertrouwelijkheid
Hoog
Integriteit
Hoog
Beschikbaarheid
Hoog
Kans op misbruik binnen 30 dagen
0.1%
Percentiel
3e
Bron: FIRST.org, bijgewerkt op 6 november 2026.
Er is geen officiële patchinformatie beschikbaar op het moment van ophalen; raadpleeg de officiële bron.
Onze eigen Nederlandstalige interpretatie en context bij de brondata hierboven.
IACS Radar-duiding
Onze eigen interpretatie en context bij deze kwetsbaarheid — geen officiële bron.
IACS Radar-prioriteringsscore
Gebaseerd op CVSS 7.8, EPSS 0.1%, industriële relevantie 35/100.
Weegt CVSS, EPSS, KEV-status, industriële relevantie en exposure-relevantie samen — een aanvulling op, geen vervanging van, de losse scores hieronder en hierboven.
Voorwaarden voor misbruik
Operationele impact & energierelevantie
Mogelijk verlies van zicht op of besturing over het proces bij succesvol misbruik.
Geen sterke energiesector-specifieke signalen herkend; algemene OT/ICS-relevantie.
Aanbevolen defensieve maatregelen
Industriële relevantiescore
Classificatie is voorlopig; handmatige verificatie door een OT-securityanalist wordt aanbevolen.
Geclassificeerd door IACS Radar-analysepijplijn (geautomatiseerd) op 7 november 2026.
IEC 62443-mapping
Automatische IACS Radar-duiding op basis van de gerapporteerde CWE-zwakteclassificatie; geen officiële certificeringsuitspraak.